Sign up for monthly updates from the SDSN.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
Questions or Comments?

We welcome your questions or comments on our work. Please get in touch with us by writing to info@unsdsn.org.

2017

  • Finding Sustainable Data Sources to Track Evictions to Monitor Progress for Achieving SDG 16

    During the consultative process to identify locally-relevant SDG indicators for Baltimore, it became clear that not only was there no consensus of which justice-related indicators were most relevant in Baltimore, but also few (if any) datasets existed to track potentially chosen indicators over time. In fact, the Vital Signs report itself was deficient in the presence […]

  • Data Tools for the California Bay Area: Actionable Intelligence for Cities to Support SDG Achievement

    This Subnational SDG Strategies brief outlines the Stanford Sustainable Urban Systems Team’s preliminary progress in developing indicators for the local reporting platform, temporal and spatial scale comparisons for the data dashboard, and Esri Story Maps for local community groups as part of the marketplace of decision-making tools. The brief also lists strengths, weaknesses, and lessons from […]

  • Reconciling polycentric administrative data to improve drinking water security in rural Bangladesh

    Ensuring safely managed drinking water for everyone is a global priority. In pursuit of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the country of Bangladesh achieved nearly universal access to improved sources of drinking water. (WHO/UNICEF 2017) However improved access targets have long been overshadowed in Bangladesh by uncertainties around water quality and safety, which in turn […]

  • Back to Top

2016

  • Indicators and a Monitoring Framework for FfD: Proposals for Follow-up and Review of the Addis Ababa Action Agenda

    This paper considers what aspects of the AAAA are already being monitored by the SDG indicator framework and identifies gaps, before reviewing a sample set of issues that should be measured using additional AAAA-specific indicators. It also presents options for establishing an indicator-based global monitoring process, as well as complementary monitoring processes at regional and national levels, and amongst non-governmental actors. It critically evaluates the feasibility of each option, setting out key recommendations for Member States.

  • Back to Top

2015

2014

2013